A Holiday Inside a Crisis

By Atlantic Corridor

Ritesh’s chair was empty before the experiment had even begun.

He had cancelled fifteen minutes before our Atlantic Corridor conversation. His absence altered the balance immediately. Ritesh is a Millennial and considerably more connected than Ismar and The Mayor, who both remember life before the internet entered almost every corner of it. We had lost the perspective of the person who might have found the challenge most difficult.

There was also an irony hiding in his cancellation. Because the internet was working, The Mayor could quickly rewrite the questions and turn a conversation designed for two members into one centred entirely on Ismar.

Without connectivity, the conversation about losing connectivity could never have taken place.

The challenge was simple to describe and increasingly difficult to imagine.

On Sunday evening, Ismar would learn that all connectivity was going to disappear at midnight. There would be no internet, WhatsApp, email, online banking, digital newspapers or video calls. The disappearance would last exactly one week.

What would he do before midnight?

“I would go to my bank and withdraw some amount of money,” he said.

That was all.

For one week, he thought the experience might be rather pleasant.

“I think it would be very nice. I would like to have this experience.”

The first disruption would arrive early on Monday morning.

One of the first things Ismar normally does after waking is send a message to his mother. If he takes too long, she begins to worry and wonder whether he is all right.

He could warn her on Sunday evening not to expect the message. He would not need to move into her home for the week. Still, the missing greeting revealed something important: his digital silence would not belong only to him.

It would enter somebody else’s morning.

The next disappearance would be music. Whenever he does not need to concentrate, Ismar listens through Alexa or YouTube. He owns CDs, but his sound system has been broken for months. Without the internet, there would be no alternative.

His apartment would become unusually quiet.

Perhaps that would not be entirely bad. Some neighbours play loud music at weekends, so the blackout might provide a little relief. He might hear more conversations, more arguments and more children playing football on the sports court near his apartment.

The digital silence would not remove sound. It would uncover the sounds already around him.

Ismar reads national and international news online. Printed newspapers are now almost impossible to buy in his city. He does not normally listen to radio news, and he does not have a television at home.

For one week, he would probably stop following the news altogether.

He would miss his daily overview, but he did not think this would be a serious hardship.

“I think I will survive that.”

He has heard people say that they became less stressed after deliberately stepping away from the news. The Mayor understood the attraction. He often scans several newspapers but finds himself reading only the headlines because the detail can become too depressing.

The harder losses would come from activities that give shape to Ismar’s week. Our English conversation would disappear. So would his French class and his online contact with the Curitiba conversation group. He estimated that approximately thirty per cent of his normal Monday would be removed.

He could open one of the English or French books in his apartment. He owns grammar books and novels in both languages. Yet even this old-fashioned alternative would reveal a modern dependency. When he meets an unfamiliar word or grammar point, he normally checks it online.

Without that help, he would simply have to continue more slowly.

Or he could use the empty time differently. Late in the day, when the sun was lower, he might take a long walk towards the airport—something he had not done for a long time.

At first, this still sounded like rest: fewer appointments, less news, more reading and a long walk.

Then we left the apartment.

The internet does not merely entertain us. It quietly coordinates the ordinary systems we assume will continue working.

Supermarkets order and organise supplies electronically. Restaurants record orders on tablets. Delivery businesses depend on apps. Traffic systems, petrol distribution and aviation all rely on connected technology.

The first day might be manageable. From the second day, Ismar imagined products becoming scarcer. By the end of the week, supermarket shelves might be empty.

He normally shops with his mother on Thursday. He would not rush to the supermarket in panic, but he expected many other people would.

There would be crowds. He might not find exactly what they wanted.

They could adapt. If there were no milk, he could make orange juice. Some foods keep longer than others. Cabbage would survive better than lettuce. A household can make substitutions for a week.

The difficulty begins when an entire city tries to make those substitutions at the same time.

Cash created an even larger problem. Ismar would withdraw money in advance, but what would happen if everybody had the same idea and the cash machines emptied? What about people who depend on cards and do not keep cash at home?

Without electronic payment, some people might have no way to buy food.

Asked to imagine himself as a city councillor, Ismar proposed a temporary local currency, issued on paper and connected to each citizen’s identification number. He also recognised the scale of the problem almost immediately.

“It would be a mess,” he admitted, especially in a city of around one million inhabitants.

Aviation presented another limit. A local paper currency might help someone buy vegetables. It would not help a traveller trying to reach São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro or another country.

“One week will be very, very problematic for some people,” Ismar said.

By now, our week of digital rest was beginning to look less like a holiday and more like the slow failure of a city.

The most serious consequences appeared when the conversation reached health care.

Ismar helps his mother with shopping, appointments and medical matters. Almost all her doctors use computers to access previous examinations, notes and patient histories. Only one still writes everything on paper.

A doctor could still listen to what a patient said that day, but without the earlier information, the consultation would become less complete. Even arranging the next appointment might depend on whether the clinic still owned a paper diary or knew how to work without its digital system.

For a known interruption of exactly one week, many appointments could simply be postponed. People might remain calm because they knew the system would return on Monday.

The greater danger would be uncertainty. If nobody knew when connectivity would return, Ismar thought many people and institutions would become frustrated rather than quickly creating alternatives.

This was the moment when the meaning of digital rest changed completely.

Rest is something we choose.

A medical system that cannot reach a patient’s records is not resting.

By the middle of the week, more than ninety per cent of Ismar’s usual contacts would be unreachable.

He would still see his mother. He could continue physical activities such as Pilates and ballroom dancing. But even people living in his own city could become inaccessible because WhatsApp is the only way he normally contacts them.

Most of the numbers and addresses he needs are stored on his phone. He does not keep them all in a paper agenda. Writing a letter would not solve the problem if he did not know where to send it.

His birthday would also fall during the disconnected week. The Mayor could not send congratulations because he did not know Ismar’s address. Even if he discovered it, a letter might arrive after the internet had already returned.

Strangely, Ismar still believed he might enjoy the quiet.

He is comfortable in his own company. He can spend an entire weekend inside his apartment, perhaps leaving only for a walk.

The Mayor imagined a different possibility. Perhaps people in Ismar’s condominium would finally come downstairs. The building has a shared outdoor area, a sports court and space for children. Residents might begin talking, organise a barbecue and rediscover the people living only a few floors away.

Would Ismar join them?

“Probably not,” he said. “Because I like to stay alone.”

It was the most Ismar-like answer of the afternoon.

The internet might disappear. The neighbours might appear. Ismar could still choose the peace of his apartment.

Yet he was careful not to treat his own preference as a model for everybody else.

For many older people who live alone, social media and messaging are not trivial distractions. They reduce loneliness and create friendships. Losing those relationships for a week could deepen depression and create real danger.

Families separated across cities and countries would suffer. Small business owners could lose their income. Restaurants operating only through delivery platforms might stop functioning. Freelance workers might produce work they could neither send nor be paid for.

For Ismar, the week might feel like a holiday.

For somebody else, it could mean invisibility.

On Friday evening, The Mayor introduced a temptation.

For fifteen minutes only, the internet would return.

What would Ismar do?

He knew immediately.

If he were not already with his mother, he would send her a message saying that everything was all right and that he would see her again soon. Then he would contact two or three people he cared about most.

He would not begin with the news.

He would not open YouTube.

He would not check what he had missed on social media.

He would use those fifteen minutes to reassure people.

Beneath the banking, newspapers, language learning, music and delivery systems, the most important purpose of connectivity turned out to be very simple:

I am all right.

I am still here.

When the imagined week ended, Ismar did not plan to abandon the internet. He would restore the tools that support his language learning, music, payments, information and relationships.

But the exercise had changed the question.

People often say that freedom is the thing they value most, Ismar reflected. Yet we have built a society in which paying bills, buying food, arranging medical care, contacting people and doing our work may all depend on one connected system.

We call this convenience because it removes effort.

We rarely notice that it also removes alternatives.

Some younger people may never have written and posted a letter. Some may not know how to order food without a phone. Many businesses no longer maintain a workable paper system. Even people who remember the old methods may no longer have the addresses, equipment or practical access required to use them.

“We are a kind of modern slave,” Ismar said.

He did not exclude himself.

“I use the internet and other connected systems to buy things, to pay things. I’m not an exception.”

At the beginning of our conversation, one disconnected week had sounded peaceful. By the end, Ismar still thought he could enjoy it—but his quiet apartment would exist inside a much louder crisis of empty shelves, interrupted care, stranded travellers, unreachable friends and people unable to access their own money.

Digital rest is restful only when it is voluntary, limited and supported by a world that remains connected while we step away.

The final irony arrived as the conversation ended.

The Mayor explained that Ritesh’s late cancellation had forced him to redesign the meeting. Technology had made that possible within minutes. The very system we had spent the afternoon removing had rescued the conversation.

Ismar smiled and offered the only suitable farewell.

“Have a nice week, sir—and with a high-quality connection.”

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *